The Covered section of ThisIsBooksMusic.com is a look at album cover homage and parody, and sometimes a bit more humor than the norm. Album cover homage has been an unspoken tradition for years, where other artists will do it on albums, picture sleeves, or in music videos. In the last year, there have been issues of Lady Gaga doing homage to a film with a dance scene, which left some people feeling it’s a violation of one’s copyright. In the last few weeks, there has been talk about photographic copyrights, and how more photographers want to be better protected in this day of digital and social media. In other words, if someone recreates a famous image with their own picture, there may be penalties. In the last week, I noticed two possibilities of potential punishment. The first is the forthcoming episode of Andrew Zimmern‘s show Bizarre Foods, where this season will keep him exploring the foods of the United States. Perhaps this was a budget concert and it would make it easier for producers to just shoot around our own country and see what weirdness lurks in our backyards. This is key, because he is going to explore the United States, so the image Zimmern and the Travel Channel are using is a tribute and parody of not only Bruce Springsteen‘s 1984 album Born In The U.S.A., but also the last 15 seconds of the video. We all know the famous ass shot of Springsteen with a baseball cap in his back pocket, but Zimmern chooses to show hos culinary vibe by carrying a napkin. Zimmern looks at the camera, which is not on the album cover, but in the last 15 seconds of the music video.
I combined the shots from the video so you can get a sense of what I’m talking about, but you can also watch the video below.
I’m a huge fan of the show Portlandia, and in last week’s episode (called Grover), Fred Armisen, Carrie Brownstein and two friends were on a scavenger hunt and sported Sgt. Pepper outfits. Now even THAT might be a violation one day, but in the scene they also did this, complete with someone walking across the street barefoot (or “caucasian flesh-colored socks”)
Could something as simple as this screenshot be considered a violation of someone’s copyright? This is not new, and it has even affected parts of the foodie community, where people say that there is a need to copyright recipes.
From the outside, it seems you can’t even do homage to something, to pay tribute for the love of something you grew up with. What’s next, hairstyles? Hair color/dye? Shoelace techniques? Everyone is broke except for the precious 1 percent, and everyone wants to make money from something that in the past had not been a concern, so why not place a price on everything from seeds to intellectual property, brick tones, to keys, melodies, and octaves? My shoe size is an 11, but because I have wide feet. Does that mean I may not be able to wear a size 11 because my feet are too wide? Explain this.
Then again, maybe it’s a minor blip of things but it’s sad to think that these mere glimpses of pop culture and photographic appreciation could one day do more harm than good.